I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
achievement was paving the way for the IBM 3614 Consumer Transaction Facility.
。同城约会是该领域的重要参考
關恆憶述，那時ICE的執法人員持有搜查令，但搜查的目標是住在同一個房子的其他房客，「來抓他們的過程中撞見我。」，推荐阅读旺商聊官方下载获取更多信息
自从他的悼词之后，我没有再公开谈论我与乔布斯的友谊、冒险与合作。我从未去读那些铺天盖地的故事、讣告，或那些奇怪的误读如何被写进「传说」。